The learning outcomes
for this lab was to become familiar with the manipulation of Lidar Data. The first
objective was the introduction of some of the tasks associated with editing raw
Lidar data so as to be able to display it within a GIS. Once the data was
displayed I learned several simple viewing and conversion techniques to be able
to symbolize and understand the data. Finally I was tasked with exporting the
data as a raster file.
Objective 1: Formatting data
At the beginning of
this lab I was provided with a point cloud data set which I was able to view in
both Erdas Imagine and ESRI ArcMap. Most of the data manipulation was done with
ArcMap seeing as it has a slightly better interface than Erdas. But in order to
get ArcMap to properly project the data I had to sift through the included
metadata file information to find its original datum and unit of measurement
for both the horizontal XY axis and Vertical Z axis. After defining this
information for the point cloud data by using ArcCatalog I was able to display
it within ArcMap.
Objective 2: Viewing the data
Once the data was
formatted properly for display in ArcMap I was able to symbolize several
aspects of the data. Four common displays are shown below in figure 1, a four
panel map showing the same extent some aspects of the University of Wisconsin
Eau Claire. The data included all returns with the exception of aspect, which
used only the ground returns so as to simplify the data display.
Figure
1. Lidar data symbolized for Elevation, Aspect, Slope, and Contour.
Elevation is the display
of height of the data, in this map the “hotter” colors (reds oranges) are
higher than the cooler colors (blues and greens). Slope shows the steepest
angles of features as a vibrant red (building walls or trees) and flatter
features (rooftops or fields) as green. Aspect is a continuation of Slope but
instead of symbolizing the degree of slope it show the direction of the slope.
Contour is a display of elevation changes by the use of user defined isoclines.
In this case the contour interval was set to five feet. With the index contours
set for every five lines.
To help see the how the Lidar interacts with a
surface and to display the 3d qualities of a dataset ESRI integrated several
featuers into their software, such as the abilitie to take cross sections of an
area to see its profile or to even render an area in three dimensions. See the
images below (Figure 2-4).
Figure 2. Profile of a
railroad bridge using the first return.
Figure 3. Profile view
of the South side of Phillips Science Hall on the UWEC campus using the first
return. One can see a surprising amount of detail in this image. Note the
observatory on the roof of the building and the sport utility vehicle parked
several floors directly below it.
Figure
4. Three dimensional rendering of features of the University of Wisconsin Eau Claire
Campus.
Objective 3: Rasterizing Data
For this objective I
was tasked with converting the point data from the LAS file to a raster file
type. From that raster file I was to make a hill shade image using ESRI
software. It was a pretty straight forward process that only involved the use
of two tools: “LAS to Raster” and “Hillshade.” The LAS to raster required some
parameters to be filled in to work properly but the hill shade tool did not
require any special inputs. Below (Figure 5) is a collaborated image of the
original LAS file, and the two derived files: raster and hill shade.
Figure 5. A progression
of data manipulation from the original LAS point data (first return), to
raster, and finally to a hill shade.
Using the same process
above I performed a raster conversion and created a hill shade of the same LAS
data file as before. The only difference being that I used ground return points
instead of first return points (Figure 6).
Figure 6. LAS ground
return data converted to raster then hillshaded.
The
final part of this lab was to generate an intensity image from the LAS file
(Figure 7).
Figure 7. Intensity
image produced from LAS data file.
This image was created
in a similar fashion as the hill shades above. The difference being that instead
of defining the elevation aspect to be converted to raster the intensity
strength was used. This shows the most reflective features in the image with
lighter tones while the more absorptive features appear darker.
No comments:
Post a Comment